In this chapter, I'm presenting results of what I hope you'll embrace as a light, even humorous series of shoots, although I must say that at the time I took the photos, I was trying pretty darn hard to make these perfecto. At the very least, for me.
In summer 2007, the instructor for an advanced photography class I was taking through the adult learning program at Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis (IUPUI) had assigned students to take and bring to class a picture incorporating the appearance of a fork. A fork as in the common dining utensil/instrument.
I admit that the first thing I thought of was somehow composing a scene in which the fork appeared at the vertex of a two-pronged “fork in the road.” The difficulty (not to mention danger) in pulling this off while shooting prone on the road itself — without getting run over by motor vehicles zooming past — persuaded me to go elsewhere.
And where I next went was ... to four months earlier when, on a lark, I had put together a still-life set up in my home dining room (you’ll read more about this in the next chapter) and tinkered with a parody of the American Gothic painting by Grant Woods, the classic depiction of an elderly farm couple standing side by side while the man holds a vertical pitchfork.
For my parody, I decided to use a fork to take the place of a pitchfork, And I used a can of soup and a sprig of fake lettuce to “dress up” the fork “holder.” See the photo below.
Too much time has passed, and I can’t be sure of this, but I believe that I submitted this photo for the class assignment four months later. The instructor must have been underwhelmed with the submissions — by all class members, not just mine — and sent us out to give it another try. I was crushed; he apparently didn’t get or appreciate the American Gothic parody. (sigh)
What followed to get me to the photo I submitted for the fork assignment reboot, in the years since the assignment, struck me today as a frolic of comedic proportions, as I perused my sundry stabs at creativity. I spent several days trying different ideas. I present to you below my various stabs at compositions over a three-day period.
I'll display the images in chronological order. I started outdoors in my backyard, then returned to the still-life “studio” in the dining room before finishing in nearby Garfield Park.
Day 1, June 29, 2007
the backyard of my home
As you can see below, I started out with a shot of the fork handle pushed pretty deep into the lawn and composed in a shallow depth of field with the neighbors’ cool (at least I thought so) — and long — gray fence as a background. In retrospect, especially after the benefit of reviewing the sundry stabs I took on these three days, this photo might have been THE one I should have submitted.
Day 2, June 30, 2007
Because on Day 2, I returned to the backyard and switched to a yellow flower (not sure what type it was) and then tried an orange lily, repeating most of the compositional concepts from the previous day — right down to applying a frame to it. So I'll streamline the Day 2 shots here and limit inclusions to three of the yellow flower and one of the orange lily.
Interestingly, I started processing the lily shots with a framed version first, so that’s the one I’ll present here. Of all the flower shots, the orange lily was my favorite. I just couldn’t figure out a way to avoid that dark shadow in the bottom left corner. Perhaps I should have placed a reflector on the left side, something that didn’t occur to me at the time.
Day 3, July 1, 2007
No comments:
Post a Comment